The good-looking, shy, young stuff is often only around for a few days so you learn to grab it fast. These are girls on the move–they’ve hit the border and need some cash to pay somebody to get them across it or they have had it and want money to get back home. Either way, they are pretty unprofessional.
Some are very selective, turning away most of the guys who approach them. Rebuffed by one such teenaged dreamboat, I told her that streetwalkers had to be a litle less virginal. Another reject laughed and said, “She’s waiting for Luis Miguel to come along.”
A pro airing out her legs across the alley and vexed to watch little Miss Picky turn down more clients than she’d had all night said, “Or maybe her Daddy.”
I remember a college professor who used to boff a co-ed a week and laid it all to being a father-figure. Is that a more wholesome reason for fucking than doing it for money? Is it less obscene for a young woman to have sexual fantasies about her father than for older men to have fantasies about their daughters? Is cross-generational sex OK as long as both people are swapping fantasies? Is it less disgusting when the younger participant is a man and the older is a woman? I’ve never heard anybody call giggolos victims of poverty, slavery, beatings, or exploitation.
Were Karen Wilkenning’s girls being forced into it, exploited by men, denied choice? Or were they just lazy or opportunistic or not inclined to see a simple sex act as a gig a deal as a couple hudred bucks. Should they? Are the anti-whore elements saying that if women aren’t forced into whoring then they are sluts? An odd position for “feminists”, but it’s being used to attempt shutting down prostitution and sex-tourism worldwide (as well as marriage-brokering). To the fempolchiks, a woman’s right or choice is only pursued if it in some way leads to less choice for men. Those who strike their own deals have to be either pitied or censured.
The only difference between the “feminist” prudes and the “paternalistic meddlers” is that while the latter blamed the women, the latter blame men. Neither seem inclined to leave blame out of it and butt the hell out.
The whole question of “exploitation” comes up because there has to be a reason to blame men, to make the women victims. Maybe doctrinaire “feminists” can be expected to miss the irony in claiming that a sexy female model being paid thousands of dollars to pose for a billboard in order to trigger men into buying more liquor or cigarettes is an “exploitation of women,” but it takes some major myopia to watch a whore dressing up, cruising, and pouncing on men in order to take their money and see a woman being exploited by men. Sexual appeal has always been a heavy advantage women weild over men and they should admit it.